Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Time running out for Peter Sands at Standard Chartered

 

Chris Blackhurst
Tuesday 28 October 2014 09:01 EDT
Comments
Peter Sands
Peter Sands (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

When Standard Chartered's popular finance director Richard Meddings left early this year Peter Sands, the chief executive, made a fulsome, gracious, speech.

No one from the top of the bank was fooled, however. They knew that for months Sands and Meddings had been clashing and they had barely been on cordial terms.

These are febrile days at the top of what was once one of Britain’s most successful banks.

Today’s profit fall, accompanied by a plunging share price, may be explained away by Sands. The reality, however, is that the latest woe will hasten a move against him that was always likely in 2015.

Sir John Peace, the chairman, no longer has a cushion.

Shareholders, led by Temasek and Aberdeen Asset Management, are unlikely to give Sands any more time.

Sands’ opponents never have been able to abide his intellectualising; his preaching about the need for regulatory reform; the fact — did they not know it? — that he’d helped the Government to rescue the other banks.

Much of the hostility, to be fair, stemmed from Sands not being one of them; he hailed from McKinsey and was never a “roll up your sleeves”, “work your way to the top” banker.

They point to Standard Chartered’s wholesale business making huge plays that may not be recovered (like a $1 billion loan to Samin Tan, the Indonesian investor in mining company Bumi); its mishandling of the New York regulator, with the bank handed a $340 million fine out of proportion to the offence; the forced loss of thousands of small to medium-sized business customers in the UAE as part of that same money-laundering fallout; the bank’s exposure to China, and a rise in Chinese interest rates. Then there are questions about Sands’ management style.

When the shares were 1950p — as they were, let us not forget, in late 2010 — Sands could do no wrong. But now they are under 1000p, it’s no longer if but when he goes.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in