Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The watchdogs are right not to kick the Co-op when it's so far down

Outlook

Jim Armitage
Tuesday 11 August 2015 20:18 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

So now we know: if you want to avoid getting fined by the regulators, just make sure you do so much damage to your business that it can’t afford to pay.

The City regulators’ report into Co-op Bank is a scathing exposé of managerial incompetence.

Risk management was practically non-existent; prudent, long-term accounting evaporated; and the business failed so abysmally to communicate up the management chain that the board had no idea of how bad things were.

Perhaps the worst example is the way it magically added nearly half a billion pounds to the solvency of the proposed Co-op/Britannia group, weeks before the 2009 merger. It achieved this by conducting an extremely aggressive accounting trick with Britannia’s 25-year bonds.

The true impact of this move was so bad that the Co-op could have backed out of the merger at the last minute under the “material adverse change” rules. But, sadly, the board was kept in the dark and the most disastrous assault on the co-operative movement went ahead.

There will be some who are angered by the lack of a financial penalty, but the regulators are right: why stamp on the Co-op’s windpipe while its new management breathes it back into life? Those baying for blood must look to the individual managers who caused the mess. Regulators’ investigations into that shameful crew should be published soon.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in