Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The second-class logic of awarding rail franchises

Outlook

James Moore
Tuesday 07 July 2015 20:08 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

No sniggering in the back now please, but yes, the Department for Transport has rather driven a coach and horses through Stagecoach’s hopes of securing a two-year extension of its South West Trains franchise.

While rail only accounts for around 14 per cent of the transport company’s operating profits, and the blow will be softened as revenues from its East Coast franchise come on stream, this will still come as a big disappointment to the company, which had been anticipating a successful conclusion to its negotiations with the Government.

The company’s critics might well be pleased at the outcome, feeling that Stagecoach shouldn’t have been allowed to walk into a contract for a service that sometimes makes them feel as if they might have been better off walking themselves.

However, the breakdown in talks has been caused not by any consideration for the interests of passengers but by a disagreement over money.

That’s the way it works on the railways, where even a successful, profitable, publicly owned franchise ends up being sold off. That franchise was, of course, the aforementioned East Coast Mainline. It seems that while you can change train, the sad service remains the same.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in