Stephen Foley: How to respond to AOL and Yahoo deal talk
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.US Outlook: There is only one proper response to the idea that Yahoo! could be target of a buyout by private equity, and that is: LOL.
I'm loath to say it definitely will not happen. There are plenty of precedents for buying and levering up companies in structural decline, but they are not happy ones. Guy Hands of Terra Firma is due in court here on Monday, litigating the mess that is his takeover of EMI. And we are still getting jaw-dropping exposés of management incompetence at Sam Zell's Tribune newspaper group, two years after it landed in bankruptcy.
But I haven't found anyone yet who thinks the numbers could possibly be fudged sufficiently to justify a private-equity funded reverse takeover of Yahoo! by AOL, an idea which has been swirling round Silicon Valley this week.
With a market cap of around $22bn (£14bn), Yahoo is many times the size of AOL, which is worth $2.7bn, but what they have in common is the same deluded idea that they can be major content companies on the internet.
Web audiences are fragmenting between must-read specialist sites and mobile apps, or disappearing into social networks – so the AOL or Yahoo! menu of recycled news and uninspired features is not a guaranteed cash cow, especially now online advertisers are finding many new options.
What about turning the tables and making AOL the target? Yahoo! at least has a lucrative display ad network, which might be enhanced if it were to swallow AOL, using its newly inflated shares as currency and taking the opportunity of a merger to do the necessary cost-slashing across both companies. Even that, though, seems like an unappealing distraction from the real business of finding a new raison d'être for both companies, something which clearly eludes Carol Bartz, chief executive of Yahoo!, and now one assumes also eludes Tim Armstrong at AOL, if the rumours of his keenness to merge are true.
The one thing that could be said for going private is that Yahoo! would be able to take a more radical approach to reshaping its business than is possible in the limelight of the stock market. I'm afraid, though, the whole thing might be just another dream.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments