Stephen Foley: Facebook poked into action by privacy regulator
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook: At last, regulators are coming to the aid of users concerned about their privacy on the internet.
Facebook looks like it is about to submit to 20 years of independent "privacy audits", under a settlement of accusations that it has repeatedly misled its users over how it will use their personal data. The Federal Trade Commission, which has used the threat of legal action to extract similar agreements from Google and Twitter already this year, is not waiting for Congress to pass any of the proposed privacy protection legislation, which looks like it might be frozen in the middle of a lobbyists' firefight for years to come.
Under the terms of the deal, as reported yesterday, Facebook will have to get explicit permission from its users before it changes their privacy settings to share more personal information. In other words, no more changing the default settings and putting the onus on us to opt out. The social network has been moving in this direction, and it deserves plaudits for having made its privacy settings simpler and more customisable at the same time – a difficult trick.
But oversight is to be welcomed, too, because there is a tension between the commercial imperative (the more Facebook gets us to share, the more money it can make from selling access to us to advertisers) and users' interests. That tension will only get more difficult after its flotation next year, when shareholders will demand it squeezes more advertising dollars from us.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments