Simon Read: System should still leave plenty of room to save for retirement
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Simplifying the pension system is crucial. Savers need to know how much they can salt away for their retirement, but the wholesale reform proposed by the last government left many scratching their heads.
So simply slashing the pension tax relief allowance to £50,000 is a good way to raise £4bn a year while leaving people absolutely clear about their limits and allowances. On top of that it will only affect 100,000 savers, most of whom earn six-figure salaries. So high-earners will be hit, but the bulk of workers will remain untouched by the changes next April.
Anything that reduces the incentive to save for retirement is bad news. But the £50,000 annual allowance should still be plenty for most people to build up a decent pension. Taking account of the ISA allowance of £10,200, it means people will be able to salt away more than £60,000 every year and get some tax advantages.
Indeed, one benefit of the planned cut in pensions relief could be that it makes some people start thinking about pensions as part of an overall savings strategy rather than just retirement planning. In the short term, high earners have six months to make the most of the existing £255,000 allowance. From April, they will have to look for other ways to save tax-efficiently, such as venture capital trusts. And, let's face it, high-earners have come off relatively lightly. The limit could have been cut to as little as £30,000, for instance. Worse – for higher-rate taxpayers at least – the relief could have been reduced to the standard 20 per cent tax rate.
Doing that would have gained many more billions for the Government and equalised pension saving for all. But that proved a step too far for the Coalition Government – as yet.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments