Simon English: Why did the company's bosses know nothing?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A statement from Conor Foley, chief executive of WorldSpreads until very recently: he "wishes to make it clear that the first he learnt of these issues was on Friday morning last, at the same time as the rest of the board of WorldSpreads".
His chairman, Lindsay McNeile, says the same. Assuming they are telling the absolute truth, and there is no reason to think otherwise, this question is begged: what on earth were they doing when they were supposed to be in charge of the business?
Rumours that WorldSpreads was in very serious trouble first reached this office even before Mr Foley stepped down. While the exact nature of the difficulty was hazy, plenty of people in the City knew something was up.
Mr McNeile denied all this with joie de vivre – he's an extremely charming fellow.
The inevitable investigation into this mess by the Financial Services Authority is bound to ask these two what they knew. If the answer really is "nothing", that doesn't seem to do them much credit.
About the last thing the spread-betting industry needed was a scandal involving a mix-up between client and company funds.
Rivals may be glad to see a competitor disappear, but annoyed at the confidence-sapping way it has done so.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments