Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Simon English: Memo to Goldman Sachs: This is (partly) why people hate you

 

Simon English
Monday 14 January 2013 15:28 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The great vampire squid’s move to even consider delaying bonus payments to some of its staff just to save them a few quid in tax indicates that it continues to live in a separate world to the rest of us.

More than that, it lives in a world beyond even most other powerful banks. Early reports on the matter said that other large finance firms had wondered whether they should wait for the tax rate to drop from 50% to 45% before paying out bonuses and quickly decided that it would look bad.

That’s a move forward, for an industry that has persistently decided that following the law is all that can be expected of it; actually doing the right thing is not in its remit.

Meanwhile Goldman is still considering whether to do something bound to attract criticism in order to save some of its top staff an amount of money smaller than those people spend on tax planning each year in the first place.

They will then moan, internally at least, about that criticism.

A while ago, Goldman earnt itself a fawning front page story in the Financial Times as it unveiled plans, in the wake of being called, to general approval, “a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity”, to turn over a new leaf.

It would put clients first. It would care how it was perceived. It would see that swanning about the place pointing to your riches as confirmation of just how brilliant you are (and therefore deserving of the riches) was annoying to nearly everyone who didn’t work at Goldman Sachs.

Perhaps the bank even meant it when it said it, but plainly this desire to do God’s work didn’t last long. The wider context is huge public fury at the ability of large corporations and rich individuals to skirt rules that apply steadfastly to everyone else.

Goldman Sachs might say that it attracts more attention than almost anyone else when these issues arise.

That it still can’t see why is somewhere close to comic.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in