Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Simon English: Even the Ministry of Truth would struggle to portray this as 'Orwellian'

Simon English
Thursday 13 September 2012 15:56 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Outlook Would George Orwell have approved of Peter Cummings? The former HBOS banker to the stars clearly thinks so. His response to the £500,000 fine imposed on him by the Financial Services Authority was to say that he had been "subjected to an extraordinary Orwellian process" by a brutal organisation, one that might come from the pages of the author's masterpiece Nineteen Eighty-Four.

An Old Etonian and a socialist, Orwell's tastes weren't always predictable, but it seems fair to guess that they did not extend to bankers, certainly not ones behind a buccaneering culture that contributed to the collapse of an organisation that millions relied upon to look after their savings and lend them their mortgages.

The banker-as-victim card is one that a few of them have tried to play lately, and it seems like a duff hand.

That they can't understand why (some of them) have been prevented from continuing exactly as before shows how far behind the curve they remain.

If you get tortured until you love Big Brother, that's Orwellian. If you get fined money you presumably can easily pay and are banned from jobs in the City you wouldn't have got in any case, well, that's irksome.

So far as we know, Mr Cummings lives contentedly in his Scottish home, surrounded by friends and family all happy to believe that he's a great guy who fell on the wrong side of a brutally awful legal process.

Mr Cummings' point that other people should get done over the HBOS fiasco is a fair one. They should. It doesn't follow that he shouldn't have been. The spinning on his behalf since the judgment came out is laughable, often based around the seeming notion that Mr Cummings is a good bloke to have a pint with, as if the FSA's case was based on suggestions otherwise.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in