Simon English: A political attack that's unfair on Adair
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook Is the attack on Adair Turner in today's Treasury Committee Report into the RBS/ABN Amro deal politically motivated?
It is quite easy to think it is. That the authors want to ensure he doesn't become the next Governor of the Bank of England, a job he clearly covets.
The chairman of the committee is the Tory MP Andrew Tyrie, and it seems a fair bet that he doesn't think that the slightly left-leaning, historically pro-Europe Turner is the right man.
The words appearing around his name – "inadequate", for example – seem pointed rather than explanatory. They appear to be written with an eye for news coverage rather than to explain what went wrong or to ensure that in the future bad banks don't take over even worse ones at our expense. The statement also has a go at the Bank of England but doesn't name names. Almost as if they were looking to protect the chances of the deputy governor Paul Tucker of getting the promotion.
The City mostly thinks that Mr Tucker is the right man for the job, and I tend to agree partly because, if nothing else, he knows where the bodies are buried and understands bankers' machinations and motives better than almost anyone.
But it still seems a bit harsh to make Lord Turner carry the can for the fact that Financial Services Authority wasn't up to the job of policing the banks. For one thing, it is likely that no watchdog anywhere could probably scrutinise banks that are simply too big to manage, never mind regulate.
It isn't really Lord Turner's fault that the FSA's remit was inadequate and that RBS was run by a loony.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments