Reinhart and Rogoff vs Herndon: the austerity maths doesn’t add up – but the theory does
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.As one of the many journalists who took Reinhart and Rogoff’s work to be a brilliant empirical underpinning for what appeared to be common-sense – that you simply cannot tax and borrow your way out of chronically unbalanced public finances – the discovery that it was, well, flawed, is something of a disappointment.
It is tempting to see this as an all-too real counterpart to that great spoof headline “Archduke Franz Ferdinand Found Alive – Great War a Mistake”: as in “economists’ backing for reducing government borrowing found wanting – global austerity programmes a mistake”. Except that, whatever went wrong with the spreadsheets, what Reinhart and Rogoff discovered was indeed right.
It is impossible to tax your way out of a chronic level of debt run up by a government. There does come a point when taxing and borrowing no longer yields the results governments seek. Taxing too much destroys incentives for everyone; pre-empts too much of a nation’s resources away from the productive parts of the economy; and the burden can indeed become so high that it becomes impossible for any tax take to service the debt. In that situation you end up borrowing just to pay the interest. High debt punishes the ability of an economy to grow and repay what it owes. The only other way out is via inflation (the usual British option). This is not and never will be sustainable.
Of course the British economy is an example of one that laboured under vast debts – 100 to 200 per cent-plus of national income – for the three decades after the Second World War. And it is true that in those years the UK did grow at a respectable pace – 2.5 per cent a year or so. But our decline was relative to other nations in those years, and by the 1970s, as all the Thatcher obsequies reminded us, it was becoming untenable. Our debt frustrated all attempts to make Britain grow as fast as her competitors. It is doing so again now. It is a truth that should be universally acknowledged, and we do not need a spreadsheet to prove it.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments