O2 will 'be more dog' but guess who foots bill?
Comment
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.As they say in the City, the share price never lies.
So why was it that, as Vodafone yesterday faced the prospect of becoming the smallest mobile operator in the UK following the “o23” deal, its shares actually rose?
Some put it down to the prospect of “merger mania” – that now O2 has lived up to its tough-guy “be more dog” ad slogan, Vodafone would have to do a deal with US tycoon John Malone’s Liberty Media.
But a Liberty transaction would be complex in the extreme and not offer Vodafone much in the way of benefits.
As the BESI bank analyst Andrew Hogley put it: “Why pay a premium to buy mobile operations in a load of countries where it has no presence and therefore no synergies?”
No, the reason Vodafone’s shares jumped in those first few minutes of stock market trading was simply this: competition will be lessened and customers’ bills will go up.
Never mind that Vodafone risks looking like an also-ran in the telecoms world. With the punters paying more for their calls and communications, profits will flow in anyway.
British competition regulators will be concerned, of course. Ofcom has tried to keep the UK supplied with four mobile companies.
But this deal is so multinational that Europe will be the judge, and precedent there suggests it will get the nod. The new company may have to share some of its network with newcomers (Sky Mobile, anyone?), but make no mistake, UK competition is set for a cull.
O2 and Three will argue that they would be able to invest in building far better network coverage if the overcrowded industry wasn’t having constant price wars.
They’ll point out that in Europe there are 100 networks for 550 million people. In the US, it’s four operators for 350 million. The result, they’ll say, is that Americans pay a little more, but enjoy the fruits of bigger investment from the operators.
It’s just a happy side effect, of course, that the companies there make more money.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments