Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Mark Leftly: Royal Mail's cheap float and the elephant in the room

Mark Leftly
Thursday 08 May 2014 20:37 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Westminster Outlook Back to the Royal Mail and the Business Select Committee on which Mr Binley sits. During last week's mauling of the Business Secretary Vince Cable and his advisers over the postal service's botched flotation, Tory minister Michael Fallon made a little- noticed comment that should have turned the tables on the committee.

One reason, so the Government claims, why Royal Mail was sold off at just 330p a share was the risk of strikes amid tense talks with the unions over pay and conditions. The committee rubbished this claim and it is a fair point: the Communication Workers Union (CWU) has hardly been a hotbed of industrial action of late when it comes to Royal Mail.

However, Mr Fallon made an equally valid point that the committee should have held a hearing with the CWU's general secretary, Billy Hayes. "Indeed, I am very surprised that you have not called the union in," Mr Fallon added cuttingly. He later told me that he "absolutely" felt it was the committee's obligation to bring in Mr Hayes.

The committee chairman Adrian Bailey counters that this view is "at odds" with the coalition majority of MPs who are on his team. But publicly asking Mr Hayes to substantiate – or contradict – the Government's claims over the heated nature of last year's industrial relations dispute would at least produce a more thorough inquiry.

twitter.com/@mleftly

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in