Mark Leftly: A case of gridlock coming up for Freedom of Information
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Westminster Outlook The justice minister Simon Hughes wants to extend Freedom of Information laws to include companies that are in effect monopolies and provide public services. National Grid, which owns and runs the electricity-transmission network in England and Wales, is the obvious example.
We should know more about the companies that run our country and Mr Hughes should be applauded for at least floating this idea.
But it’s not plausible. Sticking with the National Grid example, this is a FTSE 100 company whose shares are sensitive to the slightest bit of gossip or new information.
The group’s lawyers will inevitably claim commercial confidentiality in most FoI requests. Any appeals will get caught up in an even greater myriad of obfuscation and red tape that so undermines the system across Whitehall.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments