Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Why the London Stock Exchange-Deutsche Börse merger has been destined to fail for months

European regulators appear to have torpedoed the merger of the continent’s two biggest exchanges

James Moore
Monday 27 February 2017 07:07 EST
Comments
A city worker looking at a stock ticker screen at the London Stock Exchange, as profits at the LSE have been stung by costs associated with its attempted £21bn merger with Deutsche Börse
A city worker looking at a stock ticker screen at the London Stock Exchange, as profits at the LSE have been stung by costs associated with its attempted £21bn merger with Deutsche Börse (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Third time unlucky for the London Stock Exchange's attempts to secure a tie up with Deutsche Börse? It’s looking that way.

Out of the blue, the London side said it couldn’t sell off bond exchange MTS to keep Europe’s competition watchdogs sweet because that would upset Italy, which relies on MTS, and its regulators and could ruin its business in the country.

London's merger with Deutsche has umpteen issues, but no one saw MTS as being among them, until the EU’s competition watchdogs all but demanded its sale as the price for clearing the deal.

The LSE doesn’t think it can do that without spoiling the party.

With a fortune having been spent on making the merger work, it insists that it will still continue to pursue it, while growling about the demand to offload MTS being “disproportionate”.

That makes it look as if the British company has been taking lessons from British politicians in the art of how (not) to negotiate by shaking your fists at the other side.

In theory, the better word to use would have been “disappointing” before going on to talk about working with regulators to find an effective solution for all stakeholders. Or some similarly anodyne corporate speak for which the translation is “let’s be friends!”.

That, of course, assumes that there's a realistic chance of the LSE bringing the watchdogs around to its way of thinking. The public snarl tells you it's unlikely and the crumbling edifice is now teetering on the brink.

Blowing a raspberry at the authors of its (likely) demise just tells everyone who to blame.

In truth, however, the deal has been looking shaky ever since the fateful referendum on Britain’s EU membership. The subsequent behaviour of Britain’s Brexiteer politicians (see above) and the nasty atmosphere in Europe that has engendered has only made things worse.

That’s before you even start discussing the complexities and controversies involved in putting the two companies’ financial plumbing businesses together, which is probably the biggest fly in the ointment.

London and Deutsche haven’t satisfactorily explained how they will bolt their clearing operations together in a way that benefits everyone. Clearing ensures trades go through smoothly, especially if the financial climate is nasty and one or other of the parties to a financial transaction look as if they might default.

Clearing businesses are thus vitally important. And they are lucrative. Putting London’s together with Deutsche’s ought to make things cheaper for customers, and give the newly combined company the clout to compete with the really big guns in financial derivatives, such as the Chicago Mercantile Exchange.

However, what the two sides have never really answered is this: does London get the business? Or does Frankfurt?

The answer at the moment is umm, well, they sort of both do – honest.

It's all rather technical and arcane but also matters a lot.

Clearing is the biggest and most important business you’ve never heard of. Those in the know in the financial centres in London and Frankfurt, not to mention the political centres Westminster and Berlin, have a keen interest in what becomes of it.

The fact that MTS, and the unhappiness the EU's competition people have about it, has (probably) made the discussion academic is convenient for an awful lot of people. It spares everyone from making some hard choices. And perhaps damaging choices for the future of either London or Frankfurt.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in