Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lack of stars like Taylor Swift may damage Amazon's venture

Outlook

James Moore
Tuesday 28 July 2015 20:45 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Taylor Swift won’t be on it, having gone exclusive with Apple after the two dealt with their “Bad Blood”. Nor will Universal Music – so no Lady Gaga or Nicki Minaj (who’s also had some bad blood with Taylor).

In fact Amazon’s music streaming service was looking a bit threadbare at its UK launch. One million tracks might sound big, but it pales by comparison with the 30 million plus boasted by the likes of Spotify and Apple.

The point is, of course, that you don’t have to shell out Apple’s £120 a year for the Amazon service. You get it as part of its £79 Prime extras package. It’s designed to entice new users to join and spend their cash in Amazon’s bewildering array of online stores.

The service might therefore appeal to the budget-conscious casual listener as opposed to the committed music fan.

As such, Amazon Music is very different to Amazon’s Prime Instant Video, which stands up much better when compared to competitors such as Netflix or Sky.

But if you’re planning a limited service – as Amazon is doing – you need the big guns to make it worthwhile. You need artists with mass appeal. That means dealing with the ever contentious issue of royalties. Which is how Apple got Taylor to bite.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in