Jeremy Warner's Outlook: Here's one battle King is unlikely to win
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Mervyn King, Governor of the Bank of England, is no doubt right in principle that banks should be forced to pre-fund the planned new deposit insurance scheme. It is in theory obviously better that banks be made to fund before a crisis takes place than afterwards. Given that he is thought politically inept at the Treasury, Mr King has been surprisingly successful at getting his way over reform to banking supervision, yet this is one battle he is unlikely to win.
Few banks are in any position right now to pre-fund the type of scheme foreseen. What's more, for the bigger high-street banks, the risk of default is essentially uninsurable. There is no amount of pre-funding that would be capable of footing the bill if one of the main players went to the wall, or none that wouldn't in itself sink the banking system.
Deposit-taking in Britain is too concentrated into a small number of bigger players to make adequate pre-funding possible. There is obviously going to be a problem if the intention is to make the high- street banks pay for a scheme intended to insure not their own depositors, but those of smaller, and riskier, rivals.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments