Jeremy Warner: Deripaska, Rothschild and me
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook I seem to have joined George Osborne in incurring the wrath of the Rothschild dynasty. In yesterday's column, I wrote that it was reasonable to assume Oleg Deripaska, the Russian oligarch at the centre of the donations storm, was a client of Atticus Capital, the hedge fund group where Nat Rothschild is co-chairman. I assumed wrongly.
Mr Rothschild does indeed advise Mr Deripaska on various money-making capers, but this is in a personal capacity, and has nothing to do with Atticus. Nevertheless, the point I was trying to make seems reasonable enough.
The young Rothschild seems to have a greater sense of loyalty to Mr Deripaska than to his now presumably "former" friend, the shadow Chancellor George Osborne. I was only trying to ask the question of why, but money usually lies at the bottom of these things and in this case almost certainly does.
The Rothschilds are a money-making dynasty par excellence, and even after so many generations, it is still deep in the DNA. Mr Osborne's "offence" was to come between Nat Rothschild and his relationship with the Russian oligarch. There's naivity all round in this bizarre affair, but at least your humble columnist can still say what he wants.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments