Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

James Moore: Why we should keep faith with child trust funds

Tuesday 01 September 2009 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Outlook Here is the Institute for Fiscal Studies with a contribution to the public spending debate. A "small but not insignificant" amount towards the £26bn Britain needs to cut by 2013 could be saved by axing the child trust fund.

CTFs, of course, offer every child born on or after 1 September 2002 a £250 voucher, with children from less well-off families receiving £500. A second voucher is sent out on their seventh birthdays, the first of which are now in the post.

The CTF always looked like something of a gimmicky policy, another way for New Labour to garner a few not-so-cheap headlines. The IFS also points out that alternative cuts to benefits or tax credits will limit the money parents have to spend on children as they are growing up.

But what the CTF does is provide an asset when children turn 18 that can be used to fund education or training. The rise of Neets – young people "not in education, employment or training" – has been a striking, and worrying, feature of this recession. It will be many years before the first generation of CTFs matures, but given that, it may ultimately prove to be a rather well targeted use of the benefits system. Withdrawing it now would be a kick in the teeth for future Neets.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in