James Moore: They're really tough on business Down Under
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook Business leaders do love a good whinge, and right now they're queuing up to moan about the allegedly "anti-business climate" that has supposedly taken root in Britain.
Of course, when they talk of an anti-business climate. what they are actually referring to is the fuss about excessive executive pay. Which, they claim, is not reflected in more "business-friendly" places overseas whose citizens supposedly celebrate executives raiding the treasuries of the companies they run.
This analysis isn't entirely borne out by the facts. Pirc, the corporate governance watchdog which advises investors on how to use their votes at company annual meetings, shares an interesting little story from Australia in its most recent newsletter.
Just like in Britain, executive excess is attracting some degree of negative comment. Unlike here, the Government there has taken action: new reforms will force companies to disclose to shareholders through remuneration reports the steps they have taken to clawback bonuses and other pay where a material mis-statement has occurred in relation to a company's financial statements.
If the company has not taken action, its board has to provide a detailed explanation, and if shareholders are not happy with this they can vote against the remuneration report and boot out the board.
And there's more: A "two strikes" rule enables shareholders to vote whether to convene an EGM to fire the board if a company remuneration report receives "no" votes of 25 per cent or more at two consecutive AGMs. Crikey!
Over to you, Vince Cable.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments