Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

James Moore: The City's 'locker room code' can be pretty hard to accept

James Moore
Monday 17 February 2014 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Outlook On the face of it, big employers in the City are on a different planet to the Miami Dolphins American football team. On the face of it.

The Dolphins hit the headlines on both sides of the Atlantic after a report exposed a toxic "locker room code" that led to the offensive lineman Jonathan Martin walking out in distress.

This would appear far removed from what goes on the City, whose employees wear suits, not body armour, ply their trade in air-conditioned offices rather than fields surrounded by baying fans, and who at the outset are handed dense employee handbooks detailing acceptable conduct.

All the same, the principles enshrined in those handbooks and what occurs in practice frequently diverge sharply; the City has its own "locker room" codes that are often no less destructive than the one operated by those Dolphins.

These include never questioning the conduct of the rainmakers, especially if you are classified on the balance sheet as a "cost", as compliance or risk people are.

Staff need to "get on" with colleagues to get ahead. That means never rocking the boat, and accepting the boss's conduct as sacrosanct and their word as law. If someone should approach the HR department with concerns, it is they who should expect to face questions.

The junior, or the intern, must not under any circumstances raise a whisper of complaint. If that means pulling a succession of "all-nighters", then so be it. If that means getting the hairdryer treatment from the boss (see above) for putting a figure in the wrong column on the spreadsheet after one of those all-nighters, so be it.

One former banker told me that their industry essentially ran on "bullying and bullshit" and that this hadn't changed despite all the scandals and subsequent promises of reform.

It says it all that a very senior banker was salivating in my presence at the prospect of getting his hands on "hungry young people" from Eastern Europe. People who presumably, in his mind, wouldn't shirk at the prospect of hundreds of all-nighters.

It isn't just banking, either. Have a look at some of the reports of employment tribunals in accountancy, broking or insurance.

Of course, it isn't like that everywhere in the City, just as it isn't every NFL team whose members treat the more sensitive and introverted personalities like Martin in the way certain Dolphins did. But there are plenty of places where something nasty lurks beneath an outwardly civilised veneer. As my ex-banker friend says, the industry is still running on a combination of… but you know the rest.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in