Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

James Moore: High and electrified, or low enough for a banker to jump?

Outlook: Given that the overall costs of the project could hit £4.4bn, there is likely to be quite a bit of lobbying and horse trading

James Moore
Monday 05 January 2015 19:58 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The deadline for banks to submit their plans to ring-fence their retail operations (current accounts, small business banking etc) is looming, and already there are signs of starkly differing approaches. Barclays and HSBC would like to hold as little as possible within their ring fences because they have large investment banking operations and globally diverse businesses.

For Lloyds, and to a lesser extent Royal Bank of Scotland, however, the advantage is in holding as much as possible within the fence because they are largely UK focused retail banks. So it’s cheaper that way.

Not a problem, says the Bank of England, we’re not going to adopt a one-size-fits-all approach. That might appear to be sensible on the face of it. Trying to ram big, complex, multifaceted, square-ish pegs into round holes could be a recipe for disaster.

But just how bendy should the ring fence be? Given that the overall costs of the project could hit £4.4bn, there is likely to be quite a bit of lobbying and horse trading about that as the Bank finalises the rules.

Just the sort of lobbying and horse-trading that worried Andrew Tyrie and his Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards when they demanded that the ring fence be electrified by adopting the threat of breaking up the cheaters.

However, if the ring fence is going to be bendy, is Mr Tyrie’s threat going to be an empty one? We might be about to find out.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in