Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

James Moore: Headhunters must do more to make boards diverse

Outlook

James Moore
Monday 03 March 2014 21:01 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

One area where institutions are increasingly inclined to make their voices heard is on the vexed subject of boardroom diversity. Given the number of high-profile disasters presided over by largely monochrome male boards, it’s very much in their interests to do so.

Unfortunately, efforts to improve the situation have proved less than effective. The target of having women occupying 25 per cent of boardroom seats by 2015 set by the former Standard Chartered chief executive Lord Davies is not just unambitious. It’s unlikely to be met. The current figure for the FTSE 100 stands at just 20.4 per cent.

Which is why a report into the role of headhunters is timely. If you’re looking for reasons why progress has been so slow, they would be a good place to start, given the control they have assumed over the appointment process.

Sponsored by Vince Cable’s business department, the gist of it is that while headhunters have talked a good game, they aren’t delivering.

This is hardly surprising. The voluntary code they supposedly operate under is so weak it makes Lord Davies’ target look like the height of radicalism. The code calls on search firms to ensure 30 per cent of “long lists” for board-level positions are made up of women but it’s the short list that counts.

Given that a headhunter’s first interest is in retaining business, their natural inclination is to concentrate on the sort of people board-level directors are comfortable with. This basically means white men aged 50-plus who look and think like they do.

The report has some interesting ideas, such as calling for headhunters to commit to at least one strongly recommended woman on short lists for all board positions.

There’s even a suggestion of something more radical, with a request for guidance from the Equalities and Human Rights Commission on the creation of all-women short lists. It isn’t all that much of a stretch to move from there to quotas. More overt talk about that from Mr Cable might just concentrate minds.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in