James Moore: First blood goes to Lord Bell in battle of the heavy hitters
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook Seconds out: round two. Chime Communications yesterday unveiled the terms of the sale of its public relations and lobbying businesses to Lord Bell, who is also Chime's chairman, for close to £20m.
So that's first blood for his lordship, who has secured the deal in the teeth of opposition from that other well-known, media heavy hitter, Sir Martin Sorrell.
Sir Martin ranks below Lord Bell in titles, but when it comes to dust-ups he's a bigger puncher as boss of the media conglomerate WPP, which just happens to hold 20 per cent of Chime's shares, which he will use to try to vote down the deal.
Is this a fight he wants though? Lord Bell's staff won't need much in the way of the "dark arts" some of them they talked of using to undercover journalists to point out Sir Martin has another, rather more serious, battle on his hands.
Yesterday, Pirc became the second major voting adviser to urge clients to reject WPP's remuneration report thanks in part due to Sir Martin's eye-popping £12.9m package last year.
Pirc sees the company's habit of matching executive investments in WPP shares on a five-for-one basis as just a teensy bit excessive. Not least because the concession is granted every year and so rather immunises executives from the consequences of overpaying for acquisitions. Which WPP has been wont to do if its writedowns are anything to go by.
It might be hard to cheer for either party in the dust-up over Chime. Much easier to pick sides when it comes to the fight Sir Martin faces with his own shareholders at WPP's forthcoming annual meeting.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments