James Moore: Expensive mistakes by the City watchdog
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook Well at least the £6m blown by City regulators on the failed prosecution of three former iSoft directors wasn't public money. The Financial Services Authority, and successor the Financial Conduct Authority, are funded by the City.
As City firms are more than happy to pay quite unjustifiable rewards (there are plenty of executives who make more than £6m in a year from share-based incentives alone) they can bear the cost. It's still an embarrassment for the watchdogs, and one they should keep at the front of their minds. The first trial saw a hung jury, and that happens, but the second collapsed as a result of procedural problems. That's much harder to forgive.
The regulator must spend what it takes when it comes to investigations. But when it does spend, its credibility requires that avoidable mistakes are kept to a minimum.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments