Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

James Moore: Co-op bondholders who lost chunks of capital will not be easily palmed off

James Moore
Tuesday 09 July 2013 19:42 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Outlook The Co-op Bank's retail bondholders are the big losers in its forced recapitalisation. They're not going to take it lying down. Before anyone underestimates their ability to create problems for the Bank of England's Prudential Regulatory Authority (which they took aim at yesterday) and even the Government, then consider the example of another mutual in the form of Equitable Life.

Its policyholders engaged in a gruelling, and often bitter, uphill battle for compensation over more than a decade after seeing large chunks of their retirement savings going up in smoke thanks to a combination of poor governance, lax regulatory oversight, and government inertia in the face of it all.

Ultimately they won. A partial victory, it's true (they still feel short-changed by the compensation scheme the Government announced) but what they got is a whole lot better than what was at first on offer.

So it can be done. In forcing bondholders into a debt for equity swap, leaving them minority shareholders in a bank controlled by an owner which allowed the ship to run on to the rocks, Andrew Bailey and his Prudential Regulation Authority have found themselves in the middle of their first big scandal. It's a fair bet that the bondholders will be making their lives difficult for a number of months.

However, if their action group is serious, it should look beyond the regulator, and its capital demands (which will ultimately make for safer banks, even if the way they have been imposed is open to serious questions).

The failure of Co-op Bank, like the failure of Equitable, is at its heart a failure of governance and oversight. The Co-operative Group was sold a pup by its bank when the latter bought Britannia Building Society. Its directors failed to see the dangers they were sleepwalking into.

As much as fighting against the decisions that led them to lose large chunks of their capital and their interest payments through having their bonds converted into equity, the bondholders will want to be sure this isn't repeated.

That means setting an example to institutional shareholders in the City (and to the Co-operative Group) which have behaved as the absentee landlords for too long. When it joins the Stock Exchange the Co-op Bank's board should feel the heat of having a vocal shareholder group snapping at its heels.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in