James Moore: Common sense to put women on boards, so why the delay?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook Hooray! The Cranfield School of Management says that at last progress is being made in increasing the number of women in the boardroom. So much progress that we're in sight of a much-heralded target!
What's that, did someone at the back of the lecture theatre cough? Was that the word "spin" I heard? I do believe it was.
Cranfield's "progress" report hails the fact that in the last six months just 27 per cent of FTSE 100 and 30 per cent of FTSE 250 board appointments went to women.
So at some point, years hence, we may get near to the 25 per cent target set by Lord Davies, the former Standard Chartered boss, in his Government-commissioned report a couple of years ago. It was itself laughably unambitious when compared to the situation on the Continent.
Increasing the number of women on boards, and increasing boardroom diversity generally, isn't about box-ticking. It's not even simply about natural justice. It's common business sense.
Big companies are prone to groupthink at the best of times. Stocking the boardroom with monotone groups of middle-aged, middle-class blokes who went to similar schools and then did similar courses at similar universities only encourages this.
The net result is that the companies they oversee tend to make very similar mistakes, as can be seen through taking a cursory look at some of the cock-ups that FTSE 100 companies have made in recent years.
That's clearly not going to change any time soon.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments