How can Barclays' business be OK if its fines might cost it another £1bn?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook Barclays wants to tell you that what is described in the City as its “underlying business” is doing just fine.
For the first three months of the year, that business’s profits grew by a healthy 9 per cent, with the down-sized investment banking arm doing particularly well.
The fly in the ointment, of course, was the nearly £1bn worth of provisions made against the cost of some of the bank’s bewildering array of regulatory issues.
Some £150m will go towards the continually rising cost of payment protection insurance mis-selling, but the lion’s share – £800m in total – is slated to cover a settlement for the bank’s part in the City-wide conspiracy to rig foreign exchange rates. At least predominantly.
The bank was coy about what that means in practice, merely referring people back to its annual report, which has a rather long list of bugbears in the notes to the accounts.
That is why I have in the past questioned whether it is at all appropriate to focus on numbers “underlying” regulatory issues.
There are so many, and they are such a recurring feature of banks’ results – because it isn’t just Barclays that plays this game – that they really should be assessed as an integral part of a banking operation.
Revenues and profits from Barclays’ various businesses – from the sale of financial products to advising other companies on takeovers and mergers – go up and down from quarter to quarter.
So do the costs incurred from having previously done some of that business in an unethical manner.
We should also, really, consider the various banks’ strategies for dealing with these issues, just as we consider their mortgage pricing strategies, or their corporate lending or investment banking strategies.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments