EBay's tax affairs: Legal but utterly immoral
The e-commerce giant paid just £1.6m in UK corporation tax last year
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Yet another US internet giant is in the midst of a storm over tax, and no wonder.
EBay, a company that recorded UK revenues of $1.3bn (£980m) last year, according to the company’s US annual report, paid just £1.6m to the UK exchequer according to UK accounts filed at Companies House.
They show that the company’s revenues increased by 8 per cent to £200m in 2016, but that the profit it made on them fell by 5 per cent to £7.6m on which corporation tax was levied.
Why the very obvious discrepancy between what the filings in this country show and what appears in the US annual report?
The UK business generates its revenues through the provision of marketing and advertising services to the Swiss based eBay International.
But this is only one of the company's two main revenue lines. The other is the commissions it generates on users’ sales. It would appear that these are routed through Switzerland, where eBay International is based, and where corporation tax rates are appreciably lower than even the very generous regime that operates in the UK.
EBay has, of course, defended itself by saying that it is fully compliant with the law. And that may be true. But whether its practices are morally defensible, and acceptable, is another matter entirely. .
Frankly, if eBay can generate revenues of £980m in this country and legally pay tax of just £1.6m, then the law is an ass.
Those numbers are grotesque. There is something deeply wrong with a system that allows multinational giants to pick and choose jurisdictions so that they are able to pay a fraction of what local businesses in the territories they operate pay.
Small wonder the people get cross, and start listening to the blandishment of populists promisng to tear down a rigged system.
With an eye on their reputations, and the negative PR impact their disclosures have had, other such companies have sometimes voluntarily agreed to pay a bit extra. But only a bit.
Assuming eBay’s figures generate a lot of fuss - and they really ought to - you might expect to see questions in the House, even a select committee inquiry. All this might lead to something similar.
Even if that happens, it won’t solve the underlying problem of these stateless corporations being able to legally pay a fraction of the tax local businesses in many of the territories in which they operate have to stump up.
The problem has been festering for years now. While moves have been made towards addressing it by organisations such as the OECD, the EU, and even the UK authorities, EBay's numbers only serve to demonstrate that it is an awfully long way from being solved.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments