David Prosser: Who would want to buy Royal Mail?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook In getting through legislation for the privatisation of Royal Mail last week, the Coalition Government achieved a success that has eluded its predecessors for the best part of two decades. And that was the easiest part of the process.
Yesterday's update underlines just how difficult it is going to be to get this privatisation away, even though ministers have already agreed to saddle the taxpayer with Royal Mail's £4.5bn pension-fund deficit – and to write off £1bn of debt owed to the nation.
The first problem is that taking on those liabilities requires State Aid clearance from the European Union, with Royal Mail's rivals already spoiling for a fight. But even assuming it can sweet-talk Brussels, what does the Government think investors will see in Royal Mail, particularly in thecurrent climate for IPOs, which, to put it mildly, is not welcoming?
The picture painted yesterday was of a business in a much sharper decline than many analysts had realised – of a company struggling under the yoke of the universal service obligation and ever-diminishing margins. That's before the costs of reducing the workforce yet further – not to mention the threat of a bitter industrial-relations dispute over job losses.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments