David Prosser: Time to start regulating buy-to-let
Outlook: Unless there is better supervision, bad practices will return as the next housing bubble builds
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An odd announcement from the usually sensible Council of Mortgage Lenders yesterday: it wants the Government to reject the near-universal calls for regulation of the buy-to-let mortgage market. The CML argues that these loans are commercial arrangements and regulation would inhibit what is, in essence, an investment business mostly engaged in by professionals.
Nonsense. We need to tread carefully with regulation (these landlords are a vital source of rental accommodation) but as the only part of the mortgage industry not to be explicitly policed by the Financial Services Authority, buy-to-let stands out like a sore thumb.
The omission of buy-to-let from the mortgage regulation introduced five years ago caused real problems. You will note, for example, that at lenders such as Bradford & Bingley, Northern Rock and HBOS, default rates on these loans are much higher than on conventional advances. This part of the mortgage business has also been a magnet for fraudsters.
Don't think buy-to-let investors are opposed to regulation, either. The British Property Federation, a body that speaks for many landlords, has long campaigned for a crackdown and says it told the Treasury and the FSA about dubious practices in the sector as early as 2005.
For now, the worst of the practices seen prior to the housing market crash have stopped. Some of the buy-to-let specialists have withdrawn from the market. But unless there is better supervision, they will return as the next housing bubble builds.
Lenders and advisers already have to accept FSA supervision on every other part of their industry, so making buy-to-let a regulated product should not add to the compliance burden. Let's get on with it.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments