David Prosser: Time for the Murdochs to improve governance
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook Do not assume that News Corp's decision to pull its bid for BSkyB means an end to the corporate element of this furore. The events of yesterday only underline how overdue we are for a shake-up of the governance standards at the companies to which the Murdochs are linked.
At News Corp itself, shareholders' dissatisfaction is palpable. Even before this latest business, the company was facing legal action from investors over the price News Corp paid for Shine, the television production company founded by Elisabeth Murdoch, Rupert's daughter. "Nepotism" is how their legal suit describes the deal.
The withdrawal of the Sky offer now requires shareholders to incur further costs – the charges News Corp will already have paid investment banks and other advisers, as well as the £38.5m break fee now payable to Sky under the terms of its original offer. As Terry Smith, the accountant-turned-fund manager said yesterday, the way to assuage News Corp shareholders is not to buy them off with a share buyback, but to give all of them the full voting rights that the Murdochs enjoy with their stock.
At Sky, meanwhile, James Murdoch's position as non-executive chairman looks untenable. In truth, it always has done – News Corp's 39 per cent shareholding in Sky completely undermines Mr Murdoch's independence, however hard he may try personally to assert it – but this episode has brought the matter into focus. Large shareholders are entitled to board representation, but the chairmanship is a bridge too far.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments