David Prosser: The strange case of BAE
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook Confusion reigns at BAE Systems. Despite persistent rumours the defence company had until last night to reach a deal with the Serious Fraud Office over corruption claims, or face possible criminal charges, sources close to BAE insist it knows nothing about any such deadline.
Still, the impasse can't continue indefinitely. If it can't cut a plea-bargain deal with BAE, the SFO will have to decide whether it has the evidence to launch a criminal prosecution against the company.
For now, it is difficult to see how it could be in BAE's interests to plead guilty to allegations it has paid bribes to secure contracts around the world. Doing so might earn it more lenient treatment from the SFO, but could also see it barred from doing business with the US government, one of its most important customers.
Nor will the precedent set by Mabey & Johnson this week offer BAE comfort. It was fined £3.5m after pleading guilty to corruption charges. But despite negotiations with the SFO in the run-up to the culmination of this case, lawyers who specialise in the field say that while there was no certainty of a conviction against the company in the absence of a guilty plea, M&J didn't seem to get much in return for playing ball.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments