David Prosser: The battle for independent statistics
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook Those who wonder whether backbench MPs have any real power these days should be reassured by an announcement quietly made by the Cabinet Office on Wednesday evening (when most people were more focused on the phone hacking furore). Its publication of aletter from Dame Janet Finch, withdrawing from the selection process for the head of the UK Statistics Agency (UKSA), represents something of a triumph for parliamentary scrutiny.
For while Dame Janet was the Government's preferred candidate for the job, MPs on the Public Administration Committee, who held a confirmation hearing for her last week, were unimpressed. She left them with the impression she wasn't prepared to make a stand for the independence of the UKSA.
Whether or not that impression was correct, Dame Janet was right to stand down, having failed to convince the PAC that she had the stomach for a fight. And the committee's members were right to insist on having a candidate who wants to make this a priority.
The row reflects widespread concern about the way in which the Government (both this one and its predecessors) abuses privileged advanced access to the UKSA's work for nakedly political reasons – and the inability of the agency in recent times to improve public confidence in official statistics. The next candidate to appear in front of the PAC will now have to address those anxieties.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments