David Prosser: The bankers' fightback continues
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook "They say cut back, we say fight back." It is a battle cry that will be familiar to anyone who has ever been on a trade union march, but just now it is also a perfect characterisation of the increasingly belligerent stance that the banking sector has adopted since the turn of the year. With the noisy campaign for bonus restraint showing no sign of quietening down, senior bankers appear to have decided that enough is enough.
We heard it first from Barclays' new chief executive Bob Diamond a fortnight ago. The time for remorse is over, he said. We heard it again last week from JP Morgan Chase's Jamie Dimon, who told Davos delegates that the banks would not just "bend over" when threatened with regulation they did not like. And yesterday we heard it once more from Douglas Flint, the chairman of HSBC, who continued to drop not-so-subtle hints that his bank could leave the UK over the issue of regulation, some of which, in any case, he believes is counter-productive.
Mr Flint's criticism of the push for greater transparency on bankers' pay was especially ingenious. Publishing more information about what each bank's staff earn might actually see remuneration increase, he warned, because anyone paid less than his peers at a rival would demand a hike.
Is the fight back a co-ordinated response? Maybe so – there have been meetings between senior bankers from around the world in recent weeks – but either way it is clear the mood among financiers has changed. Contrition is out of fashion: the trend now is the push back against additional regulation.
In the UK, the banks may be pushing at an open door. George Osborne's public utterances on the banking sector of late have been full of his desire to move past the current hostilities. If he can get a deal on lending targets – don't expect it to be demanding – he will make that case more vocally.
Elsewhere, too, the atmosphere has calmed. The debate in the US is no longer primarily concerned with pay and bonuses. In Asia, remuneration was never much of an issue in the first place.
Many people will resent the attitude of the banks, which whether or not they took taxpayers' cash directly, all benefited from our bail-out of the system. But after a lengthy period in which bankers felt they had no choice but to accept their punishment, we are entering a climate in which extracting further recompense from them is going to prove ever more difficult.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments