David Prosser: Pensions that melt away
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook: If public sector workers are the cats that get the cream in terms of pension provision, spare a thought for staff at Dairy Crest. The milk producer yesterday added its name to the growing list of private sector companies planning to close its final salary pension scheme. Like Barclays, IBM and Morrisons, Dairy Crest says it can no longer underwrite the expense and volatility of a defined benefit fund.
Every time a private sector employer announces this sort of move – and Dairy Crest will absolutely not be the last – it adds to the pressure for public sector pension reform. The cost of these benefits, an unfunded liability in the Government's accounts, is no longer defensible.
And while scaling back the pension benefits on offer to future public sector workers – or even reducing those that existing employees get – will not do much to help the public finances in the short term, ducking the long-term headache is an abrogation of duty.
The divide between public and private sector on pensions is now a question of natural justice. Private sector staff who are no longer entitled to a guaranteed pension can't be expected to go on paying taxes to finance exactly that benefit for those in the employment of the state.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments