David Prosser: Own goal looming at Manchester United
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook It's not been a bad start to the season for Manchester United: the team is top of the table, the manager has been lauded for some smart transfers completed well ahead of the chaotic end to the transferwindow, and now the business has unveiled record profits – even that horrible debt pile has started to come down rapidly. All in all, this is a healthy backdrop against which to launch the initial public offering in Singapore that the club's owners are thought to be considering.
If, however, the market gossip is correct, the Glazers are planning a two-tier share structure for their $1bn flotation. It is now understood that the stock they plan to sell off will not carry voting rights.
That would be unfortunate. For one thing, investors value non-voting shares at a discount – understandably enough, since they offer the risks of ownership without all of the rights. The Glazers will get less bang for their buck by structuring the deal this way.
For another, dual share structures are ghastly from a corporate governance perspective. Consider the best-known large company with such a structure in place: Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation. Is this the example that the Glazers – who cannot have failed to notice all the criticism of their stewardship of Manchester United – really want to follow?
It's not as if the owners need worry about losing control, for they propose to sell only a minority stake – possibly as little as 25 per cent. Since they will remain absolutely dominant whether or not they sell stock with voting rights, why sell corporate governance standards short or riskraising less money than possible?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments