David Prosser: O2's coup is a gamble
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.It looks like O2 is about to pull off another coup, landing, we hear, the UK rights to the Palm Pre, the touchscreen phone that many in the mobile-technology industry think is a genuinely credible threat to Apple's iPhone.
O2, of course, also has exclusive rights to the iPhone here. But while you can see the attraction of such deals to O2 and its rivals, why would a handset maker choose to limit potential sales by selling only to the customers of one network?
Interestingly, Palm's boss, Jon Rubinstein, used to work at Apple, so he's following the distribution model of his former employer. One rationale is technological – neither Apple nor Palm is a phone specialist, and as each network requires tweaks to the handset, partnering with just one makes life simpler.
The more compelling argument, however, is about commercial risk. Apple partners such as O2 pay the company a licence fee to sell its phones, guarantee a certain level of sales and sometimes even offer a cut of revenue from data traffic. Palm has been negotiating very similar deals.
For a new venture, this strategy limits the fallout if it proves to be an expensive flop. In other words, O2 will be taking the gamble on the supposed iPhone killer, rather than on Palm.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments