Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

David Prosser: Not much of a welcome for ITV's new boss

Tuesday 15 September 2009 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Outlook First, an apology. Contrary to the impression given by this newspaper and all others, ITV is not the sick man of broadcasting, brought low by a combination of the recession and poor programming. No, it is the dominant force in commercial broadcasting today, able to trample all over advertisers who cannot do without it – unless, that is, a powerful regulator intervenes.

That, at least, is the picture painted yesterday by the Competition Commission, as it rejected the case for abandoning the contract rights renewal regime that has prevented ITV using its dominant position to exploit advertisers since the merger of Carlton and Granada in 2003.

This is one of those cases where you can pick your statistics to suit your argument. ITV points to the explosion of digital television over the past six years, which has seen the number of households with multi-channel viewing facilities more than double. With all those new competitors, ITV points out that its share of television advertising revenue has slipped from 48 per cent to 36 per cent since 2004.

The Competition Commission doesn't dispute those figures. But it is more interested in other data, such as ITV's 90 per cent plus share of mass audience programmes. It is impossible to mount a large-scale television-based advertising campaign targeting a number of crucialdemographic audiences without using ITV, the Commission says.

The ruling is undoubtedly a blow to ITV (and to other commercial broadcasters, which tend to set their advertising rates at a discount to ITV's charges). Not only will the continuation of CRR make it tougher for ITV to raise its rates, but the Commission's report is also effectively a sideswipe at the way the company has been managed – with these sort of advantages, results should have been better.

There will now be a continued period of discussions between ITV, the Commission and other interested parties. But a deal looks out of the question before the crucial negotiations over 2010 advertising campaigns begin.

Nor will Michael Grade, who could set a finish date as early as this week, bequeath his successor at ITV a more benign regulatory environment – one of the objectives he has been working towards throughout his three years at the helm.

All very disappointing. ITV's new boss certainly has his work cut out. Maybe that's why the broadcaster has taken such an age to find the right candidate. The delays can't be down to any lack of competence within ITV (despite all the public backbiting over certain candidates). That's not the sort of company the broadcaster is, the Competition Commission said yesterday.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in