David Prosser: No easy answers on bandwidth charging
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook The suggestion yesterday from Ed Vaizey, the minister for culture, that Britain might allow internet service providers to charge content providers for the traffic they generate – threatening the principle of net neutrality – is a giant step.
One can see the point. The huge amount of bandwidth that, for instance, the BBC's iPlayer service accounts for is forcing many ISPs to invest heavily in improving their networks. Yet the BBC does not contribute a penny towards the cost of that infrastructure.
On the other hand, even leaving aside the high-minded principles so many on the internet hold dear, there's a pretty horrible competition issue here. If the biggest content providers are able to pay ISPs for their traffic to be prioritised, what hope do their smaller competitors have? How would the iPlayers, YouTubes and Facebooks of tomorrow get started?
This is dangerous territory – and not just for its threat to the democracy and pluralism of the internet that is so admirable. Still, there are no easy answers. An alternative funding model, for instance, would be to charge net users more for the bandwidth they consume. This presumably wouldn't be popular either.
And Mr Vaizey did make one significant contribution yesterday. Though other countries have taken a different approach, he does not believe there is a case for different rules depending on whether you are talking about mobile or fixed-line internet access. That must be right in an age of convergence.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments