David Prosser: New Isas, old problems
Outlook: The tax break is expensive and adds to the impression that Isas are over-complicated
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Some good news for hard-pressed savers. From today, the maximum permissible investment in a tax-free individual savings account rises by £3,000 to £10,200. The whole lot can be invested on the stock market (or other asset classes, such as bonds) or half of it can be shovelled into cash deposits. Either way, all income and growth is tax-free.
There is just one catch. The new rules only apply to savers aged 50 or above. Everyone else is getting the extra £3,000 allowance too, but not for this tax year – they'll have to wait until 2010/11.
It's a curious distinction. Older savers have a bit less time to put cash by before retirement, of course, but an extra six months is not going to make much of a difference, individually, to their fortunes in old age. And while older people are more likely to be dependent on savings interest for income – and therefore struggling in a low interest-rate environment – this won't make much difference.
Collectively, however, the tax break is expensive. It also adds to the impression that Isas are over-complicated. With different rules for people of different ages and different investment limits according to the asset you choose to hold, the scheme is off-putting. Good intentions spoiled again.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments