David Prosser: Glencore ahead on Xstrata
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook: Glencore's bond issue yesterday prompted renewed speculation that it is planning an IPO next year. That may be so, but the more pressing issue is what the fundraising might mean for mining giant Xstrata.
Last year, Xstrata, in which Glencore has a chunky holding, paid $2bn for the commodity trader's Colombian coal mining business Prodeco. At the time, the deal suited both sides. Xstrata got its hands on a great asset, which has fuelled much of its growth this year, while Glencore, which was then a little strapped for cash in the face of a squeeze on commodity prices, was able to participate in Xstrata's $5.9bn rights issue and avoid seeing its holding diluted.
Now, however, the deal may turn out to have been more one-sided than it seemed. Glencore retains an option to buy Prodeco back for $2.25bn plus costs. That contract expires at the beginning of March, but thanks to the bond issue, Glencore already has the money it needs to pay for the business.
In retrospect, Xstrata's purchase of Prodeco last year was less of a strategic investment for the long-term and more of a short-term loan. And though that loan will generate an impressive return, shareholders would rather keep the prized Colombian mines.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments