Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

David Prosser: Feeling the credit crunch at the ballot box

Outlook: If Mr Brown did see the need for more regulation, why on earth didn’t he do something about it?

Monday 26 January 2009 20:52 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

So the credit crunch has claimed its first government, with the ruling coalition in Iceland collapsing yesterday following protests about the country’s parlous financial state. Iceland’s government may be the first administration to be wrecked by the credit crunch, but don’t bet on it being the last. And the way Gordon Brown is carrying on right now, he’s right in the firing line.

The Prime Minister is within his rights to point out that this recession is a global phenomenon triggered by a worldwide banking crisis. Mr Brown is also perfectly correct in pointing out Britain’s last two recessions, under Conservative administrations, of course, were caused by domestic factors that those governments either fanned or failed to control.

However, none of that excuses Mr Brown from his share of the blame for that banking crisis. Why doesn’t he just admit that, in retrospect at least, it would have been sensible for policymakers to be more interventionist on financial regulation over the past 10 years or so?

The claims made yesterday by the Prime Minister, that he called for better financial regulation 10 years ago, just make him look silly. Does Mr Brown now say he has spent a long and lonely decade campaigning for reforms that irresponsible colleagues around the world denied him? And if he honestly did see the need for more regulation, why on earth didn’t he do something about it? Perhaps then he really might have saved the world.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in