Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

David Prosser: Bankers are not leaving the City

Thursday 29 July 2010 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Outlook The reaction of the British Bankers' Association to proposed new rules from the Financial Services Authority on bonuses has been drearily predictable: yet another warning that the City's finest will flee the country if we police their pay more stringently than other jurisdictions.

Although we have been hearing this lament from the banking sector ever since the credit crisis began prompting greater regulation and new taxes, there has been no flight from London as yet.

In fact, remuneration experts say that what the FSA is proposing – the headlines are that 40 per cent of bonuses will have to be deferred for three years and that 50 per cent of the payment will have to be in the form of shares – is broadly in line with what potential competitor markets for financial services staff are planning. And like elsewhere, our rules will only apply to individuals whose activities might pose a risk to their firms.

However, even if the FSA was proposing to go further than others, it's worth remembering what the point of these rules is. This is not an attempt to limit bankers' pay – firms will continue to be free to pay bonuses of any size they want – motivated somehow by envy or revenge. Rather it an exercise in ensuring that traders and managers are not incentivised to take the sort of short-term risks that blew up so many institutions during the crisis.

Now, it may be that there are people in the City who resent having their trade fettered in this way. If so, we should not be sorry to see them to depart to rival employers in other jurisdictions. Let them run the risk of bringing down other people's banks rather than our own.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in