David Prosser: A pension reform for the very well-off
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook The Government's announcement yesterday of new rules that will end the requirement for people with private pension funds to convert their savings into an income via an annuity by age 75 at the latest looks, at first sight, like a sensible cut to red tape.
The reality, however, is that this reform will be of use to only a tiny handful of very wealthy savers who can afford to continue taking investment risks with their pension funds during old age.
Moreover, while savers with annuities are unable to pass on pension funds to their heirs, those who avoid buying a guaranteed income will be able to do so, albeit subject to a tax charge. In other words, while this measure may be dressed up as pension reform, it is actually just another concession on inheritance for the wealthy.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments