Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook Do the central bankers know something we don't? Deputy governor Paul Tucker told the Treasury Select Committee this week he was concerned the Bank/Treasury Funding for Lending Scheme (FLS) wasn't hitting the spot. And Paul Fisher, who was the monetary engineer put in charge of setting up the FLS, gave a speech in Bristol that was less than enthusiastic about its impact. Figures showing how the FLS performed between October and December will be out on Monday. But these hints from Threadneedle Street seem to suggest they aren't going to blow us all away.
So what next to encourage bank lending? Mr Fisher cited an interesting fact in his Bristol speech. He pointed out that almost half of all the stock of UK bank and building society lending to corporates is to the property sector, and much of the rest of their loans will be secured on property.
That's a plausible explanation for the relentless deleveraging we're seeing from the banks in spite of all the inducements put in place for them to lend. With the commercial property sector still on its knees, lenders may feel they are sitting on a massive chunk of, as yet, unrealised losses. This could explain what many regard as their unreasonable conservativism when it comes to new lending.
If one buys this, the old argument in favour of a good bank/bad bank split, which should enable the good banks to expand their lending freed from the millstone of poor legacy assets, must surely look more attractive than tweaking incentives through schemes like the FLS.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments