'Are either of them actually here?' asks Alliance Trust shareholder
Spare a thought for Anthony Brooke, one of the two men forced on to Alliance Trust’s board by Elliott Advisors
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Believers of the old adage “first impressions count” should spare a thought for Anthony Brooke, one of the two men forced on to Alliance Trust’s board by Elliott Advisors.
The investment banking veteran was an anonymous onlooker during the first half of the company’s AGM at Dundee’s Gardyne Theatre, until one shareholder finally asked the question that had been on everyone else’s mind: “Are either of them actually here?” he said, referring to Mr Brooke and fellow Elliott nominee Rory Macnamara.
“Yes, I believe Anthony Brooke is. Can you stand up, Anthony?” responded chairman Karin Forseke, just about containing her delight at the prospect of what was about to unfold.
There was poor old Mr Brooke, towards an exit near the back. After mumbling about not having a microphone, he said: “I have no knowledge of the company other than what I read in the press.” Not the thing to say to an auditorium full of retail investors, already seething at not being able to approve the appointment of a man they scarcely knew.
After speaking to shareholders, Ms Forseke and her chief executive, Katherine Garrett-Cox, are now fully aware that their Vision 2020 had better start showing results in 2015, otherwise shareholders will be baying for blood next year – not least Elliott, which can start publicly criticising Alliance again once their entente cordiale expires in a year’s time.
There was no major pay revolt with just 6.71 per cent of investors failing to back the company’s remuneration report, yet the discount at which its net asset value trades at remains a concern judging by the reaction from the audience. Just one investor, Roger Lawson of advisory group ShareSoc, called for either Forseke or Garrett-Cox’s head. How different things could be next year, if things don’t pick up.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments