Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Alliance Trust board is partly to blame for its problems

Outlook

James Moore
Monday 15 February 2016 20:45 EST
Comments
Katherine Garrett-Cox could pocket a £1.4m payoff after leaving Alliance Trust
Katherine Garrett-Cox could pocket a £1.4m payoff after leaving Alliance Trust

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Katherine Garrett-Cox’s departure from Alliance Trust became inevitable the moment she was ousted as group chief executive. Having left the board, she briefly stayed on as chief executive of the fund management arm, but it speaks volumes that now she’s leaving that job she won’t be replaced.

Don’t feel too sorry for her. Ms Garrett-Cox made millions during her tenure and leaves with a £1.3m pay-off. She will also be able to take her pick of non-executive directorships in the future, if that’s what she wants to do.

But there remains a wider point to be made about the troubles at the trust since American activist investors parked their tanks on its lawn, and drew in a bevy of small savers to serve as infantry on the back of sub-par performance and rising costs.

Ms Garrett-Cox took the blame for that, and some of it is deserved. But she wouldn’t have ascended to the position of group chief executive if she didn’t have something about her in the first place.

All the more so given her gender – and yes, that point is entirely valid. The City remains, primarily, a boy’s club. Ms Garrett-Cox’s success in it stands out because of its rarity.

Why, then, did she fail at Alliance? Perhaps because she was allowed to. There was an entire board around her who failed to recognise the issues that were developing at the trust until the Americans rolled into town and forced it to.

As is so often the case, this wasn’t just a failure by a chief executive, it was also a failure of governance.

That is something the investment trust sector would do well to reflect upon, if it wants to keep those tanks at bay.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in