Comment: 'No more bailouts' for too big to fail banks - is Carney right?
Video: Jim Armitage provides a run-down of the day's major news from the City
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Mark Carney, the Bank of England governor, today declared that taxpayer’s cash should never again be used to rescue banks.
The governor set out a bunch of new plans aimed at forcing creditors to bail out banks getting into trouble rather than us.
Since the financial crisis, regulators and governments have done much to force our banks to raise more money as a capital cushion in the event of another financial meltdown.
But Mr Carney wants to go further: he wants to force the biggest banks to create an even bigger financial cushion. The bigger the bank, the bigger the cushion.
Now, in my view, Mr Carney’s moves are all well and good.
But they miss the whole point that the financial crisis and all those taxpayer bailouts made clear – we have allowed our banks to become way too big for our own good.
None of these additional measures would be needed if we had taken the opportunity to break up the megabanks while we, the people, had the upper hand during the crisis. Instead, we stood by as the megabanks made themselves even BIGGER by gobbling up the weaklings.
As a result, we have never in history had so few banks which are so systemically important.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments