Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Close call at Ewart

John Murray
Monday 31 August 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

BOTH CAMPS in the battle for control of Ewart, the Northern Irish property group, claimed a winning position ahead of an extraordinary meeting on Friday, writes John Murray.

A company source said the two sides were probably evenly balanced with about 45 per cent core support each, but that most of the remaining 10 per cent would go the board's way.

However, Phil Monahan, who is a non-executive director of Ewart, claimed to have the backing of at least 52 per cent of the voting shares for his proposal to remove four members of the board and install two new directors. He controls a 29.2 per cent stake and has irrevocable undertakings of support from holders of a further 10 per cent.

But it emerged at the weekend that Mr Monahan's stake in Ewart - held by Wexford Shopping Centre - was paid for by a loan note which has yet to be redeemed. That would leave Mr Monahan facing a large capital loss when the note is repaid, as the value of the stake has halved since it was bought in 1989.

His fellow directors accuse him of attempting to take over the company without making a bid.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in